First-time posters: please review the site's moderation policy

Are there any statistics out there? Has anyone totted up the numbers in national associations?

asked 02 Jan '15, 05:08

Andy's gravatar image

Andy
6.7k212739

Still no answer to this so I thought I would push it back to the top again with this comment

(03 Oct '15, 03:28) Andy

It depends on your definition of a conference interpreter. If you only take AIIC members, AIIC USA site says:"Founded in 1953, the International Association of Conference Interpreters (AIIC) now brings together 3000 professional conference interpreters in more than 250 cities and over 90 countries." http://usa.aiic.net/

permanent link

answered 03 Dec '15, 23:08

Cyril%20Flerov's gravatar image

Cyril Flerov
566259

Thanks Cyril. I know of that figure of course. I was looking for a number covering all conference interpreters. For example the German VKD (http://vkd.bdue.de) of the BDU claims to have 600 members. AIIC only has 295 members in Germany. So it would seem that there are far more conference interpreters than members of AIIC (which is no surprise). But are there any figures anywhere to give a better idea?

(17 Feb '16, 06:54) Andy
1

I think this could be part of an interesting, wider research project!

(17 Feb '16, 10:04) David

...I'm afraid there are no hard figures anyone could put a finger on... if for no other reason because official (tax etc) figures, if any (none are available in most jurisdictions, because such level of dis-aggregation is not seen as useful)do not distinguish between professional conference interpreters and those who "do" conference interpreting. Furthermore, the latter are more often than not outside professional associations... whose membership is of course non-compulsory, not even for professionals. To make matters worse, professionals often are members of more than one association, not necessarily limited to conference interpreters, ie the effort involved in extracting meaningful numbers - if at all feasible and representative - is probably non-commensurate with their usefulness.

This being said, in my professional salad days (eg 20 years ago, when we were notifying DGIV) I used the following rule-of-thumb,based on experience and gut-feeling: aiic membership stood roughly for 1/2 of professional conference interpreters and 1/3 of all doing CI :-)... I wonder whether colleagues would still vouch for this breakdown, these days... or whether it should now be fourths, the latter section standing for 2 of them?

permanent link

answered 17 Feb '16, 10:33

msr's gravatar image

msr
4.6k6923

Thanks MSR. That theory seems to hold for Germany if you look at my quick bit of research above (300/600).

(17 Feb '16, 11:38) Andy
1

Yes, but some VKD members are AIIC members, and obvs vice versa. So I would think in that one case there is a bit of an overlap. In Spain, OTOH, I don't think people are members of both the national association and AIIC, and that could give you better stats.

(19 Feb '16, 09:09) JuliaP
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×481
×38

question asked: 02 Jan '15, 05:08

question was seen: 14,779 times

last updated: 19 Feb '16, 09:09

interpreting.info is a community-driven website open to anyone with questions and/or answers about interpreting, i.e. spoken language translation

about | faq | terms of use | privacy policy | content policy | disclaimer | contact us

This collaborative website is sponsored and hosted by AIIC, the International Association of Conference Interpreters.